Research on fan speed optimization control system based on advanced algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wind energy is a widespread natural phenomenon, which receives more and more attention because of its renewable and non-polluting nature, but the unpredictable and unstable wind speed makes the wind power control technology become a hot spot of concern. Firstly, the working principle of the wind turbine system is introduced, and the wind turbine speed model of the wind turbine drive system is established according to the system stability characteristics. Then on the basis of the traditional PID control algorithm, a wind turbine rotation speed regulation optimization algorithm based on PID optimization control is proposed-PID neural network control. The algorithm designs a three-layer forward PID neural network, and through the PID variable structure control, the low-speed axis of the fan connects the rotor axis with the gear box, which excites the operation of the aerodynamic gate for speed regulation, and compared with the traditional PID control, the method can regulate the airflow of the coal mine fan more quickly, and the overshooting amount is reduced by about 22%. Then, the BP neural network control is used to predict the air demand, and the deviation of the predicted air demand from the current air demand and its chemical rate are input into the controller. Finally, through the comparison of the control system and simulation experiments, it is proved that the BP neural network control has stronger robustness and adaptability, and can achieve better control effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".