MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409587015 · doi:10.1111/ene.70110

The Results of <scp>ADVANCE</scp>‐<scp>CIDP IVIG</scp> Trial: Intravenous Immunoglobulin 10% Therapy With <scp>GAMMAGARD LIQUID</scp>/Kiovig for Treatment of Relapse in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy

2025· article· en· W4409587015 on OpenAlexaff
Mamatha Pasnoor, Colin Anderson‐Smits, Todd Levine, Vera Bril, Juan Marcos Solano, Konrad Rejdak, Josep Gámez, Elisabeth Chroni, Carlos Casasnovas, Enrico Marchioni, Gabriele Siciliano, Dario Cocito, K Sivakumar, Alberto Rivero, Kim Duff, Erin Greco, Massimo Corbo, Shabbir Hasan, Amir Dori, Jens Schmidt, Jamie Wood, Zhaoyang Li, Hakan Ay

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Neurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersTakeda Development Center Americas
KeywordsMedicinePolyradiculoneuropathyPlaceboInternal medicineChronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathyClinical endpointMultifocal motor neuropathyConfidence intervalRandomized controlled trialAntibodyImmunologyGuillain-Barre syndrome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: ADVANCE-CIDP IVIG evaluated the efficacy and safety of immune globulin infusion (human) 10% solution (IVIG 10%; GAMMAGARD LIQUID, also known as Kiovig) in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) as a rescue treatment for patients relapsing during the ADVANCE-CIDP 1 trial. METHODS: Open-label ADVANCE-CIDP IVIG included adult patients with confirmed CIDP relapse (≥ 1-point increase in adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment [INCAT] disability scores from pre-treatment baseline) during ADVANCE-CIDP 1, which assessed the efficacy and safety of hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG) 10%. Patients received an induction IVIG 10% dose (2 g/kg) followed by maintenance infusions at the same monthly equivalent dose of pre-randomization IVIG, 3-weekly for 6 months. The primary outcome was the responder rate (≥ 1-point decrease in adjusted INCAT scores at treatment cessation vs. pre-IVIG 10% baseline, in patients receiving placebo in ADVANCE-CIDP 1). Other outcomes included the responder rate across all patients relapsing on fSCIG 10% or placebo in ADVANCE-CIDP 1, time to functional improvement (≥ 1-point decrease in adjusted INCAT score), and change in adjusted INCAT scores and Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS) centile scores from pre-IVIG 10% baseline. RESULTS: Overall, 20 patients received IVIG 10% (n = 4 [fSCIG 10%-relapse group]; n = 16 [placebo-relapse group]). Responder rate (95% confidence interval) was 100.0% (80.6%-100.0%) in the placebo-relapse group and 95.0% (76.4%-99.1%) in the overall-relapse population. Across all patients, median time to functional improvement was 25 days. At treatment cessation, mean changes from pre-IVIG 10% baseline in adjusted INCAT and R-ODS centile scores were -1.9 and 12.9, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IVIG 10% effectively treated CIDP relapse and improved functional abilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of NeurologySame topicPeripheral Neuropathies and DisordersFrench-language works237,207