MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409587176 · doi:10.1016/j.cirep.2025.200224

The effect of corn starch and Kappa-Carrageenan probiotic encapsulation on growth and immune response in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha)

2025· article· en· W4409587176 on OpenAlexafffund
Maureen Frances Latimer, Manuel Soto‐Dávila, Ivan Cadonic, Paul M. Craig, Brian Dixon

Bibliographic record

VenueComparative Immunology Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAquaculture disease management and microbiota
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward IslandUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOncorhynchusChinook windCarrageenanFisheryCorn starchProbioticImmune systemFood scienceBiologyChemistryStarchFish <Actinopterygii>Immunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• The combined coating agent of corn starch and k-carrageenan did not affect Chinook salmon growth. • The coating agent triggered proinflammatory and regulatory immune responses in the hindgut. • No immune response changes were seen in secondary organs like the spleen and head kidney. • The coating agent induced gut homeostasis via cldn15 upregulation, but did not improve gut integrity via other TJ molecules. • Immune and gut gene changes were temporary, requiring more long-term study on the coating to use in aquaculture. Probiotics offer a promising alternative to antibiotics for managing aquaculture diseases, but their efficacy depends on maintaining stability during storage, feeding, and gastrointestinal transit. To achieve this, coating agents like corn starch and kappa-carrageenan are used in probiotic feed preparation, though some coatings may have unintended adverse effects. A feed trial was conducted to assess the impact of coating agents on growth and immune performance in Chinook salmon. Three treatments were tested: regular feed, regular feed coated with corn starch and k-carrageenan, and probiotic-supplemented feed with the same coating. The probiotic feed included a mixture of Pediococcus acidilactici MA18/5M and Limosilactobacillus reuteri LRE2. Fish growth was determined at 0-, 1-, 3-, 7-, 28, and 42-days post diet supplementation, and head kidney, spleen, and hindgut were collected. Transcripts encoding il-1b, il-8 , and tgfb were evaluated by qPCR. Additionally, in the hindgut, cdh1, cldn15, jam1a, muc2, marveld2, vil1 , and zo-1 were assessed to determine changes in gut barrier integrity. No significant differences in weight or length were observed between treatments measured over 42 days. The proinflammatory cytokines il-1b and il-8 in the spleen and head kidney showed no significant changes with the coating or probiotic treatments. However, the regulatory cytokine tgfb was significantly modulated. In the hindgut, all three transcripts and gut barrier integrity genes were modulated on day 1, day 7, or both in coated treatments. These findings indicate that corn starch and k-carrageenan as a combined coating agent has no short-term adverse effects on Chinook salmon growth or immunity and is effective for delivering probiotics to enhance fish health in aquaculture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComparative Immunology ReportsSame topicAquaculture disease management and microbiotaFrench-language works237,207