MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409591774 · doi:10.1177/15266028251333670

Predicting Outcomes Following Carotid Artery Stenting Using Machine Learning

2025· article· en· W4409591774 on OpenAlexafffund
Ben Li, Badr Aljabri, Derek Beaton, Mohamad A. Hussain, Douglas S. Lee, Duminda N. Wijeysundera, Ori D. Rotstein, Charles de Mestral, Muhammad Mamdani, Graham Roche‐Nagle, Mohammed Al‐Omran

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Endovascular Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchPhysicians' Services Incorporated FoundationOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
KeywordsMedicineMaceReceiver operating characteristicLogistic regressionCarotid stentingStroke (engine)Brier scorePerioperativeMyocardial infarctionInternal medicineSurgeryCarotid endarterectomyCarotid arteriesMachine learningConventional PCI

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) carries important perioperative risks. Outcome prediction tools may help guide clinical decision-making but remain limited. We developed machine learning (ML) algorithms that predict 30-day outcomes following transfemoral CAS. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) targeted vascular database was used to identify patients who underwent transfemoral CAS between 2011 and 2021. Input features included 36 preoperative demographic/clinical variables. The primary outcome was a 30-day major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE; composite of stroke, myocardial infarction [MI], or death). The secondary outcomes were 30-day stroke, MI, death, carotid-related morbidity, other morbidity, non-home discharge, and unplanned readmission. Our data were split into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Using 10-fold cross-validation, we trained six ML models using preoperative features with logistic regression as the baseline comparator. The primary model evaluation metric was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Model robustness was evaluated with calibration plot and Brier score. Variable importance scores were calculated to determine the top 10 predictive features. Performance was assessed on subgroups based on age, sex, race, ethnicity, symptom status, stent type, and urgency. RESULTS: Overall, 2093 patients underwent CAS during the study period. Thirty-day MACE occurred in 130 (6.2%) patients. The best-performing prediction model for 30-day MACE was XGBoost, achieving an AUROC (95% CI) of 0.93 (0.92-0.94). In comparison, logistic regression had an AUROC (95% CI) of 0.67 (0.65-0.68), and existing tools in the literature demonstrate AUROCs ranging from 0.58 to 0.74. For secondary outcomes, XGBoost achieved AUROCs between 0.86 and 0.97. The calibration plot showed good agreement between predicted and observed event probabilities with a Brier score of 0.02. The top three predictive features in our algorithm were (1) symptomatic carotid stenosis, (2) age, and (3) American Society of Anesthesiologists classification. Model performance remained robust on all subgroup analyses of specific demographic and clinical populations. CONCLUSIONS: Our ML models accurately predict 30-day outcomes following transfemoral CAS using preoperative data. They have the potential for important utility in guiding risk-mitigation strategies for patients being considered for CAS to improve outcomes.Clinical ImpactTransfemoral carotid artery stenting (CAS) carries important perioperative risks. Outcome prediction tools may help guide clinical decision-making but remain limited. Using data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) targeted vascular database, we developed machine learning (ML) models that accurately predict 30-day outcomes following transfemoral CAS using preoperative data, outperforming logistic regression and existing tools in the literature. The models were well-calibrated and remained robust across demographic and clinical subpopulations. These ML algorithms have the potential for important utility in guiding risk-mitigation strategies for patients being considered for transfemoral CAS to improve outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.795

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Endovascular TherapySame topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesFrench-language works237,207