MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409595273 · doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.04.173

A mechanistic study of retained δ-ferrite in additively-manufactured Grade 91 steel

2025· article· en· W4409595273 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhe Lyu, William D. Hoffmann, Waris Khan, Thomas J. Lienert, Leijun Li

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials Research and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAlliance de recherche numérique du Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceFerrite (magnet)MetallurgyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A combined experimental, characterization, and simulation study has been conducted to develop a quantitative description for microstructural evolution during Laser-Directed Energy Deposition (L-DED) of Grade 91 steel. Initial L-DED deposits of Grade 91 made without preheat exhibiting much greater volume fractions of δ -ferrite and much less martensite than anticipated, with non-uniform hardness values and lower average hardness levels. Based on our hypothesis for this result, preheating was applied to subsequent deposits, but not for the conventional reasons related to control of austenite decomposition . Rather, the results were consistent with the concept that greater times in the higher temperature range for the δ to γ transformation permitted the transformation to progress further toward completion during L-DED of Grade 91 owing to slower cooling rates resulting from increased preheating. Increasing preheat temperatures up to 350 °C resulted in deposits with progressively lower volume fractions of retained δ -ferrite with greater fractions of martensite and higher average hardness values. The final phase fractions and resulting hardness levels are dependent on the δ to γ transformation kinetics that are dictated by the cooling rates for transformation, which in turn are governed by the preheat temperatures. The results of our work have broader implications toward rationalizing the microstructures and properties for AM with rapid cooling rates of many hardenable alloy steels that solidify as δ-ferrite. Finally, the model results were used to develop a novel revision to the continuous cooling transformation diagram for Grade 91 that captures the kinetics of the δ to γ phase transformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Materials Research and TechnologySame topicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesFrench-language works237,207