MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409603129 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-127

A Study on the Economic Linkage of Greater Sanya Tourism Highway and the Synergistic Path of Double Leaders in Universities Based on Big Data Computational Optimization

2025· article· en· W4409603129 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicE-commerce and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinkage (software)TourismPath (computing)Big dataRegional scienceEconomic geographyPolitical scienceComputer scienceBusinessGeographyData miningChemistryArchaeologyComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the status quo of Sanya Digital Intelligence Tourism Economy, this paper puts forward the strategy of intelligent teaching change under the dual-leader cultivation mode of colleges and universities.Relying on clustering analysis technology to achieve the mining processing of the whole process data of the wisdom teaching platform, to promote the optimization of the process of wisdom teaching change.The catechism data of the basic course of tourism management of a smart teaching platform is collected, and z-score and PCA principal component analysis are utilized to eliminate the quantitative influence of the data.The best cluster values were determined by hierarchical cluster analysis, and the learners were divided into three cluster groups with the help of K-Means clustering algorithm.One-way ANOVA was introduced to compare the achievement data before and after smart teaching of the three groups of students to explore the effect of smart teaching.The results showed that among the paper grades, category 2 students had the greatest change in the mean value of their grades.In practical grades, the mean value of category 2 students' practical grades was 95.63, which was 20.18 and 26.75 points higher than those of category 0 and category 1 students, respectively.pvalue of 1.56951E-17 was less than 0.05, which indicated that the grades of the three categories of students showed significant differences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicE-commerce and Technology InnovationsFrench-language works237,207