MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409603170 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-108

A Study on Trust Clustering of Perceived Recommendations Considering Patient’s Trust Propensity in the Context of “Internet+Healthcare” Services

2025· article· en· W4409603170 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Health careThe InternetCluster analysisInternet privacyPsychologyBusinessWorld Wide WebComputer sciencePolitical scienceGeographyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Internet + medical health" service is an important direction of current medical development.The high interactivity between doctors and patients in online medical services and the massive and dynamic nature of recommended information have brought new challenges to the platform's analysis of patient perceived trust.It is difficult for the trust transfer model to process massive information in real time.Clustering massive recommended trust is an effective solution, but data clustering is difficult to process simultaneously with the perceived recommendation trust tendency, which brings about the problem of perceived recommendation trust clustering.How to measure the trust tendency reflected in the clustering of patient perceived recommendation trust is a difficult problem faced by the trust transfer model in the context of Internet medical health services.This paper proposes a two-stage research idea of " conversion first, clustering later".Intuitive fuzzy sets are used to measure the fuzziness of patient perceived recommendation trust, and combined with sentiment dictionary, density clustering method and other methods to cross and penetrate each other, a patient perceived recommendation trust clustering method is constructed in the context of Internet medical health services.Finally, data experiments were conducted using the real data of the top 17 doctors on the Haodafu online platform to verify the effectiveness of the method.This method can reflect the subjectivity and ambiguity of patients' perceived trust, provide a solution for the processing of massive recommendation information, contribute to the research on the improvement of trust transfer method system, and provide method support for predicting and analyzing the trust measurement of patients in the context of Internet medical health services.The model proposed in this paper can be used as the core of the trust-based recommendation system in Internet medical care, and help Internet medical platforms formulate precise strategies for doctors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.437
Threshold uncertainty score0.633

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it