Cultural Inheritance and Innovation Path of Digital Art: Integration and Development of Computer-Assisted Art Creation and Digital Media Technology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Under the impetus of computer technology, the creation of digital art continues to develop, and computer-assisted creation has gradually become the mainstream of artistic creation.This paper is oriented to digital art innovation, in-depth exploration of computer-assisted art creation and its integration with the development of digital media.Through the in-depth analysis of computer-assisted art creation, this paper constructs an improved CycleGAN art pattern generation model by introducing the self-attention mechanism in the CycleGAN model on the basis of pattern generation.In the generation experiments of the improved CycleGAN model, the SSIM and PSMR values of the improved model in this paper are 0.721 and 17.563, and in the number of in-parameters, the model size, and the running speed are reduced compared with the traditional model, and the overall performance of the improved model is excellent.At the same time, the works based on the computer-aided art creation method of this paper compared with the traditional art creation works of the comprehensive average score increased by 11.40 points, further illustrating the more advantageous in computer-aided art creation.The study concludes by analyzing the path of the combination of computer-aided and digital media, and proposes a path for the integration and development of the two from multiple perspectives, which provides directions and ideas for the research on the integration and development of computeraided and digital media technologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".