Research on Approval and Global Optimal Path Planning Strategy for Bulk Transportation Based on Greedy Algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Under the new situation of continuous and stable development of China's economy, large products have extremely high requirements on transportation safety due to their high price, complex transportation technical requirements, which determines that large products should be delivered to customers in the safest and most economical way, which poses a difficult problem for decision makers to choose the optimal path.In this paper, we constructed an intelligent approval framework for bulky transportation, made technical and economic analysis of transportation routes, and established a multi-objective optimization mathematical model for path selection of bulky transportation vehicles.A hybrid genetic algorithm incorporating greedy strategy is proposed to solve the problem, which strengthens the ability of the algorithm to jump out of the local extremes and selects the optimal chromosome in the final population as the resulting optimal solution.The results of the approval and optimal route planning for bulky transportation are verified by the method of example experimental analysis.The volume of bulky transportation increases with the increase of years until 2023, and the GDP, value added of tertiary industry, total population, and road mileage are 1015987.54,553948.15,140563, and 536.48, respectively.In the instances where the number of orders is 2000 or more, the transportation distance, the maximum number of service bundles of orders on the route, and the maximum service hours of vehicles the mean values are 50, 3.56, and 14.33, respectively.According to the constructed mathematical model, the optimal line for the bulky transportation scheme is 0→2→4→7→8, and the total transportation cost is 670,500,000 yuan, of which the transportation costs are 116,500,000 yuan, 320,000 yuan, 151,000,000 yuan, and 83,000,000 yuan, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".