MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409605138 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-272

Evaluation of the Balance of Management Power Distribution in Universities Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

2025· article· en· W4409605138 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEducational Reforms and Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Graduate EducationStrong
KeywordsAnalytic hierarchy processBalance (ability)Distribution (mathematics)Power (physics)Process (computing)HierarchyComputer scienceProcess managementBusinessOperations researchMathematicsPolitical sciencePsychologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to realize the optimal distribution of university management power under the overall planning and scheduling mode, an evaluation model of university management power distribution balance based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is put forward, and a method based on the integration of Internet thinking and technology, a sampling model of characteristic information of university management power distribution balance under the overall planning and scheduling mode, According to the quantitative recursive analysis results of the sample data of university management power distribution balance under the overall planning and scheduling mode, the information fusion of university management power distribution under the overall planning and scheduling mode is carried out, the association rule fusion characteristic distribution parameter set of the panel data of university management power distribution balance under the overall planning and scheduling mode is extracted, and the data fusion of university management power distribution balance under the overall planning and scheduling mode is carried out by combining the joint statistical probability density distribution detection method.Combined with the piecewise linear estimation method, this paper constructs the statistical characteristics of the equilibrium evaluation of university management power distribution under the overall planning and scheduling mode, analyzes the equilibrium characteristics of university management power distribution under the overall planning and scheduling mode according to the quantitative recursive analysis results of prior samples, extracts the equilibrium characteristics of university management power distribution under the overall planning and scheduling mode, and clusters the information of the equilibrium characteristics of university management power distribution under the overall planning and scheduling mode by structural characteristics extraction and fusion clustering methods.According to the results of distributed integration of features, it evaluates the balance of management power distribution in colleges and universities under the overall planning and scheduling mode.The simulation results show that this method has high accuracy and good confidence in evaluating the balance of management power distribution in colleges and universities under the overall planning

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it