MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409605166 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-274

Evaluation model of auxiliary employability of special population based on AHP-FUZZY algorithm

2025· article· en· W4409605166 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Technologies in Various Fields
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmployabilityFuzzy logicAnalytic hierarchy processComputer sciencePopulationAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematicsOperations researchPsychologySociologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to realize the quantitative management of the quality of higher education, this paper puts forward an evaluation model of auxiliary employability of special people under the concept of public employment service based on AHP-FUZZY algorithm.The phase space distribution structure model of special people's auxiliary employability under the concept of public employment service is constructed, the index parameter set of special people's auxiliary employability under the concept of public employment service is established, the fuzzy association rule distribution set is constructed by principal component analysis and fuzzy parameter estimation, and the association rule characteristic quantity of special people's auxiliary employability under the concept of public employment service is extracted.Advanced statistical analysis methods, such as principal component analysis, big data fusion analysis and fuzzy detection model, are adopted to classify the multi-dimensional attribute features of special people's auxiliary employability under the concept of public employment service, and the data is partitioned and scheduled in the fuzzy clustering center according to the differences of statistical feature parameters of employability analysis reports, and the feature decomposition model of special people's auxiliary employability under the concept of public employment service is constructed.The auxiliary employability of special people under the concept of public employment service is fused by blocks and the regional structural parameters are reorganized.The binary structural characteristics of auxiliary employability analysis of special people under the concept of public employment service are reconstructed in the subspace fusion database.According to the reconstruction results, fuzzy clustering is carried out under principal component analysis and fuzzy parameter estimation, and the optimal evaluation of auxiliary employability of special people under the concept of public employment service is realized.Based on SPSS statistical analysis software and Matlab simulation tool, the empirical simulation analysis of the evaluation shows that the characteristic clustering of the evaluation of the auxiliary employability of special population under the concept of public employment service is good, the reliability of the ✉Corresponding author.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicAdvanced Technologies in Various FieldsFrench-language works237,207