MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409625903 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-2917

Abstract 2917: Utilizing artificial intelligence for the discovery of a novel CNS-penetrating ATR inhibitor

2025· article· en· W4409625903 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah Truong, Beibei Zhai, Louise Ramos, Mona Marzban, Fariba Ghaidi, Peter R. Guzzo, Mehran Khodabandeh, Seyed Ali Saberali, Jason Rolfe, Marshall Drew-Brook, John Langlands, Dennis Brown, Jeffrey Bacha, Mads Daugaard

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
Topicinterferon and immune responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroscienceComputational biologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein serine/threonine kinase (ATR) plays a crucial role in regulating DNA damage repair. ATR inhibitors have shown promise against solid tumors, not only as monotherapies, but also in combination with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy with several clinical trials ongoing. The ATR inhibitors currently in clinical development have low CNS-penetration and are therefore sub-optimal for the treatment of brain tumors and brain metastases. It has been proposed that ATR inhibitors could be used as a monotherapy or could be used to potentiate the cytotoxicity of radiotherapy, one of the mainstay treatments for brain tumors. Development of novel, potent, CNS-penetrating ATR inhibitors could provide a new treatment alternative for patients with few options. Traditional drug discovery methods are time-consuming and costly, necessitating innovative approaches. Here, we describe the application of the Enki™ platform, an artificial intelligence approach, in the discovery of a novel ATR inhibitor for use against brain tumors. Methods: The Enki™ platform utilizes generative AI and deep machine learning to search a broad chemical space to identify hits. It uses variational autoencoders to optimize many properties simultaneously within the search space, including maximal potency against the primary target, selectivity, ADMET, and physicochemical properties. This platform was used to generate de novo molecules with optimized properties to penetrate the blood-brain barrier and specifically target ATR. Results: We will present preliminary results from the de novo molecule generation by the Enki™ platform. Validation of in vitro data, including ATR inhibition and selectivity, BBB permeability and metabolic stability, will be described. Conclusion: The Enki™ platform is being leveraged for the development of a CNS-penetrant ATR inhibitor, significantly accelerating the drug discovery and development process. Use of this system enables a broader exploration of the vast chemical space and refinement of drug properties, both shortening the drug development process and increasing specificity and efficacy of potential therapeutics. Citation Format: Sarah Truong, Beibei Zhai, Louise Ramos, Mona Marzban, Fariba Ghaidi, Peter Guzzo, Mehran Khodabandeh, Ahmad Issa, Seyed A. Saberali, Jason Rolfe, Sarah Omar, Marshall Drew-Brook, John Langlands, Dennis Brown, Jeffrey Bacha, Mads Daugaard. Utilizing artificial intelligence for the discovery of a novel CNS-penetrating ATR inhibitor [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 2917.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.154
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicinterferon and immune responsesFrench-language works237,207