MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409626222 · doi:10.1002/acs.3984

Sensor Fault Detection and Isolation in Multi‐Agent Systems

2025· article· en· W4409626222 on OpenAlexaff
Kaustav Jyoti Borah

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFault detection and isolationIsolation (microbiology)Computer scienceFault (geology)Real-time computingArtificial intelligenceBiologyBioinformatics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Sensor fault detection and isolation in multi‐agent systems (MAS) with uncertain dynamics and undirected, connected communication networks is addressed in this article. The proposed approach involves a two‐step process: First, fault detection, and then likelihood‐based fault isolation. A novel fault reconstruction technique is introduced by tuning the unscented Kalman filter (UKF) noise covariance matrices within the Q ‐learning framework. This adjustment helps reconstruct the uncertain states of the MAS and train the internal parameters of a neural network using historical measurements. This innovative method is referred to as Enhanced reinforced UKF (ERUKF). To reduce neural network approximation errors, a robust control term utilizing the hyperbolic tangent function is applied. The stability of ERUKF, when combined with the robust control method, is mathematically proven using the Lyapunov theorem. Simulations illustrate that ERUKF exhibits lower estimation errors compared to adaptive UKF, achieving a 96.67% success rate in fault isolation under Monte Carlo (MC) simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal ProcessingSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207