MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409626525 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-2744

Abstract 2744: Interrogating the functional roles of differential CTCF-binding sites in IDH-mutant gliomas using a novel CRISPR library

2025· article· en· W4409626525 on OpenAlexaff
Ebru Yilmaz, Alişan Kayabölen, Doğancan Özturan, T.E. Tekoglu, Ester Calvo Fernández, Sedef Sarac Yalcinkaya, Nathan A. Lack, Mario L. Suvà, Tugba Bagcı-Önder

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCRISPRMutantBiologyGeneticsComputational biologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are frequently observed in gliomas, and their mutation status is accepted as a CNS tumor classification marker. IDHs are enzymes that convert isocitrate into alpha-ketoglutarate (α-KG). Mutations in IDHs cause neomorphic enzymatic activity, by which D-2-hydroxyglutarate (2- HG), the oncometabolite, is produced from α-KG. This leads to the inhibition of α-KG-dependent enzymes, such as DNA and histone demethylases, thus altering chromatin structure and gene expression profile. CTCF is a methylation-sensitive structural protein that recognizes specific DNA motifs. It dimerizes, together with cohesin, forms chromatin loops, and determines the boundaries of topologically associated domains. Previous work demonstrated that IDH-mutant gliomas have hypermethylation at CTCF-binding sites, leading to reduced CTCF binding and permitting a constitutive enhancer to interact aberrantly with a glioma oncogene. Despite the unique epigenetic features of IDH-mutant gliomas and the ever-increasing importance of IDH mutation in patient prognosis, there has been no comprehensive study on the functional roles of CTCF binding sites in these tumors.We reanalyzed publicly available CTCF ChIP-seq data of three IDH-wild type (wt) and three IDH-mutant glioma cell lines, determined differential CTCF ChIP-seq regions, and aimed to explore their functional roles in glioma survival. To investigate the effect of methylation and demethylation of a specific CTCF binding site in both IDH-wt and -mutant gliomas, we developed a novel paired gRNA library targeting the left and right sides of these differential regions, which consists of 899 paired gRNAs. The CRISPR droplet screens are being conducted using dCas9-fused DNMT3A&3 and TET1 effector proteins, causing DNA methylation and demethylation, respectively. Beyond the alterations of gRNAs in the population, the single-cell transcriptomic readout will be obtained at the end of the screen.Our library design offers advantages over available libraries as it can be utilized with different CRISPR approaches. This high-throughput epigenome editing approach will allow for identifying regulatory interactions leading to tumor cell survival in IDH-wild type and -mutant gliomas. Citation Format: Ebru Yilmaz, Alisan Kayabolen, Dogancan Ozturan, Tahsin E. Tekoglu, Ester Calvo Fernández, Sedef Sarac Yalcinkaya, Nathan A. Lack, Mario L. Suvà, Tugba Bagci Onder. Interrogating the functional roles of differential CTCF-binding sites in IDH-mutant gliomas using a novel CRISPR library [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 2744.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→