MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409626711 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-3883

Abstract 3883: Evolution of genomic and epigenomic heterogeneity in prostate cancer from tissue and liquid biopsies

2025· article· en· W4409626711 on OpenAlexaff
Marjorie Roskes, Alexander Martinez‐Fundichely, Weiling Li, Sandra Cohen, Hao Xu, Shahd ElNaggar, Anisha B. Tehim, Metin Balabin, Chen Khuan Wong, Yu Chen, Benjamin J. Raphael, Ekta Khurana

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpigenomicsProstate cancerProstateCancer researchCancerLiquid biopsyTumor heterogeneityMedicinePathologyBiologyInternal medicineDNA methylationGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is an aggressive, highly plastic, late-stage disease. We previously showed that the two histological subtypes, adenocarcinoma (CRPC-Adeno) and neuroendocrine (CRPC-NE), show four epigenetic and transcriptomic subtypes: CRPC-AR depends on the androgen receptor pathway, CRPC-SCL is stem-cell like, CRPC-WNT is dependent on the WNT pathway, and CRPC-NE has high expression of neuroendocrine markers. Here, by analyzing data from 500 patients with tissue and/or liquid biopsies, we uncover the landscape of molecular heterogeneity in patient tumors. Analysis of whole-genome sequencing revealed genomic variants associated with CRPC-SCL and allowed development of a computational classifier which can predict presence of CRPC-SCL in patient tumors solely using genomic alterations with 81% accuracy. In particular, analysis of matched chromatin conformation data (Hi-C) showed a complex rearrangement on chromosome 4 disrupts enhancer - promoter contacts leading to downregulation of MOB1B, which can lead to upregulation of the YAP/TAZ pathway that is characteristic of CRPC-SCL. Joint computational inference of epigenomic state and genomic variants from cell-free DNA collected at multiple points during the evolution of resistance to AR signaling inhibitors allowed investigation of genomic and epigenomic co-evolution at an unprecedented resolution. We discuss the current limits of detection for tumoral epigenomic and genomic states using cell-free DNA for clinical application. Importantly, our study demonstrates the utility of liquid biopsies for discovery of basic biological mechanisms leading to treatment resistance, beyond their use for biomarkers. Citation Format: Marjorie Roskes, Alexander Martinez-Fundichely, Weiling Li, Sandra Cohen, Hao Xu, Shahd ElNaggar, Anisha Tehim, Metin Balabin, Chen Khuan Wong, Yu Chen, Ben Raphael, Ekta Khurana. Evolution of genomic and epigenomic heterogeneity in prostate cancer from tissue and liquid biopsies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 3883.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→