Environmental impacts generated by artisanal coal mining in Sanagorán, Huamachuco
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The research aims to assess the environmental impacts resulting from coal extraction in artisanal mines located in Agopampa and Huacchac, within Sanagorán, Huamachuco. To achieve this, technical visits and field consultations were conducted with miners and local inhabitants. A methodology based on direct observation and data collection was applied, identifying environmental impacts on the abiotic components (water, soil, and air) and the biotic component (tree deforestation). The evaluation was based on environmental impact intensity criteria: high, medium, and low. A total of 21 environmental impacts were identified, with 40% classified as high intensity, 40% as medium intensity, and 20% as low intensity. One of the most alarming findings was the daily average consumption of 5424 kg of wood in the mines. Additionally, the increase in coal prices led to two main effects: a rise in solid waste production, heightening ecological concerns, and the commercialization of sterile materials, reducing their contaminating impact on the soil. In conclusion, the manual extraction of coal in the area has severe consequences for the ecosystem and public health, while also serving as a crucial economic source for many mining families.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it