MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409627440 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-2276

Abstract 2276: Whole exome sequencing of immune-mediated colitis in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

2025· article· en· W4409627440 on OpenAlexaff
Pooja Middha, Zoe Quandt, Karmugi Balaratnam, Eduardo Cárdenas, Christina J. Falcon, Princess Margaret Lung Group, Matthew A. Gubens, Scott Huntsman, Khaleeq Khan, Min Li, Christine M. Lovly, Devalben Patel, Luna Jia Zhan, Melinda C. Aldrich, Geoffrey Liu, Adam J. Schoenfeld, Elad Ziv

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExome sequencingImmune systemMedicineImmune checkpointCancerColitisCancer researchExomeColorectal cancerMicrosatellite instabilityImmunologyMutationInternal medicineBiologyImmunotherapyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer treatment, providing survival benefits across multiple cancer types. Despite this remarkable advancement, ∼15-30% of patients develop immune-related adverse events (irAEs). One of the common irAEs is immune-mediated colitis, and the incidence ranges from 1% to 25% by type of therapy. Previously, we have shown that polygenic risk scores of ulcerative colitis predict colitis irAE. However, the role of rare coding variants on the development of colitis irAE remains largely unknown. Methods: We conducted whole exome sequencing for colitis irAE in 1, 215 cancer patients treated with ICIs. Association analyses were carried out for each gene separately for protein-truncating missense variants, predicted splice (Sp) variants, and non-synonymous predicted deleterious (deN; CADD≥20 or VEST≥0.8) or any non-synonymous (N) variants. The main association analyses were burden tests in which genotypes were collapsed to a 0/1 variable based on whether samples carried a variant of the given class. All models were adjusted for age at diagnosis, sex, type of ICI therapy, recruitment site, and five ancestry-informative principal components. The exome-wide threshold for significance was set at 2.5 × 10-6, with genes beyond this considered significant. Results: Among 1, 215 patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), 60 (4.9%) developed colitis. We identified rare coding variants in two genes associated with an increased risk of colitis at the exome-wide significance level: PT+Sp+N variants in LRRC47 (OR = 5.5, P = 2.4 × 10-6) and PT+S+deN variants in PFKP (OR = 65.9, P = 1.2 × 10-6). Additionally, PT+S+deN variants in PTPRH showed a suggestive association with colitis irAEs (OR = 8.8, P = 7.1 × 10-5). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the role of rare coding variants in colitis immune-related adverse events (irAEs) among cancer patients treated with ICIs. Our findings highlight two exome-wide significant associations, implicating variants in LRRC47 and PFKP in the development of colitis irAEs. LRRC47 has previously been linked to inflammatory bowel disease through differential methylation patterns. Furthermore, genes involved in glycolysis, including PFKFB3, PKM, and PFKP, have been shown to be upregulated in patients with ulcerative colitis. Abnormal activity of PTPRH has also been reported to disrupt the regulatory mechanisms of the intestinal mucosa, potentially contributing to inflammation. These findings provide novel insights into the genetic underpinnings of colitis irAEs in cancer immunotherapy. Citation Format: Pooja Middha, 1 Zoe Quandt, 2 Karmugi Balaratnam, 3 Eduardo Cardenas, 1 Christina J. Falcon, 4 Princess Margaret Lung Group, Matthew A. Gubens, 1 Scott Huntsman, 1 Khaleeq Khan, 3 Min Li, 1 Christine M. Lovly, 5 Devalben Patel, 3 Luna Jia Zhan, 3 Melinda C. Aldrich, 6 Geoffrey Liu, 7 Adam J. Schoenfeld, 4 Elad Ziv1. Whole exome sequencing of immune-mediated colitis in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 2276.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers→French-language works237,207→