Abstract 2780: Topoisomerase IIb binding underlies frequently mutated elements in cancer genomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Type-II topoisomerases resolve topological stress in DNA through controlled double-strand breaks. While TOP2A is a chemotherapy target in proliferating cells, the ubiquitously expressed TOP2B is a potential off-target. Here we explore roles of TOP2B in mutagenesis by generating DNA-binding maps of TOP2B, CTCF, and RAD21 in human cancer samples and analyzing these maps for driver mutations and mutational processes in 6500 whole cancer genomes. TOP2B-CTCF-RAD21 and TOP2B-RAD21 sites are enriched in somatic mutations and structural variants (SVs), especially at evolutionary conserved sites displaying high transcription and long-range chromatin interactions. TOP2B binding underlies SVs and hotspot mutations in cancer-driving genes such as TP53, MYC, FOXA1, and VHL, and many cis-regulatory elements. We show that the TOP2B-bound mutational hotspot at RMRP drives tumor initiation and growth in vivo. These data highlight TOP2B as a protector of the genome from topological challenges whose aberrant activity promotes driver and passenger mutations in cancer genomes. Citation Format: Jüri Reimand, 1 Christian A. Lee, 1 Robin H. Oh, 2 Zoe P. Klein, 1 Nina Adler, 1 Sana Akhtar Alvi, 3 Ellen Langille, 2 Elisa Pasini, 4 Kevin C. Cheng, 1 Diala Abd-Rabbo, 1 Huayun Hou, 3 Ricky Tsai, 2 Mamatha Bhat, 1 Daniel Schramek, 2 Michael D. Wilson, 3 Liis Uusküla-Reimand3. Topoisomerase IIb binding underlies frequently mutated elements in cancer genomes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 2780.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".