MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409628316 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-2020

Abstract 2020: Fibroblast derived type III collagen pro-peptides (PRO-C3) in plasma is associated with outcome for patients with NSCLC treated with anti-PD1 plus chemotherapy

2025· article· en· W4409628316 on OpenAlexaff
Nicholas Willumsen, Lola Lecru, Thibaut Brugat, J. C. A. Stagg, Bertrand Routy, M.A. Karsdal

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChemotherapyFibroblastInternal medicineCancer researchOncologyChemistryBiochemistryIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Tumor fibrosis is essential for defining outcome of patients with various solid tumors including lung cancer. The associated cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) activation and increased deposition of type III collagen leads to immune exclusion and high interstitial pressure in the tumor microenvironment. Recently, the USA FDA issued a Letter of Support to encourage use of the non-invasive fibrosis biomarker PRO-C3 (type III collagen pro-peptides) in patients with solid tumors (https://www.fda.gov/media/169332/download). Here we investigate PRO-C3 as a prognostic biomarker in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: First, we investigated the PRO-C3 production (measured by ELISA) and total collagen deposition (Sirius red staining) in primary lung CAFs activated with TGF-beta, by use of the validated scar-in-a-jar in vitro model. Second, we measured PRO-C3 in pre-treatment plasma samples from 40 patients with stage IIIa to IVb NSCLC. Patients were treated with Pembrolizumab (anti-PD1) plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy (carboplatin, cisplatin, pemetrexed, or paclitaxel). PRO-C3 was correlated to overall survival outcome (OS) by Kaplan Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis after allocating patients into PRO-C3 subgroups (below/above the median of 51.5 ng/mL). Results: PRO-C3 was produced by lung CAFs after activation with TGF-beta in vitro and PRO-C3 correlated to increased net-collagen deposition. Among the 40 patients with NSCLC, the median follow-up was 13.2 months. Patients with high PRO-C3 had a median OS of 9.0 months compared to 31.5 months in patients with low PRO-C3 (log-rank p-value=0.0023). In support, patients with high PRO-C3 had a Hazard Ratio (HR) for OS of 3.8 (95%CI: 1.5-9.7, p=0.004). Conclusions: Type III collagen pro-peptides (PRO-C3) was produced by activated lung CAFs and is a surrogate of fibrogenesis. High PRO-C3 levels in pre-treatment plasma was associated with poor outcome for patients with NSCLC treated with anti-PD1 plus chemotherapy. These data suggest that quantifying tumor fibrosis is important for prognostication of patients with lung cancer. Citation Format: Nicholas Willumsen, Lola Lecru, Thibaut Brugat, John Stagg, Bertrand Routy, Morten A. Karsdal. Fibroblast derived type III collagen pro-peptides (PRO-C3) in plasma is associated with outcome for patients with NSCLC treated with anti-PD1 plus chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 2020.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicHead and Neck Cancer Studies→French-language works237,207→