MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409630653 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-4186

Abstract 4186: Discovery of novel PARP1-selective inhibitors for treatment of brain tumors using artificial intelligence

2025· article· en· W4409630653 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah Truong, Beibei Zhai, Louise Ramos, Mona Marzban, Fariba Ghaidi, Fuqiang Ban, Jason R. Smith, Mohit Pandey, Ekaterina Manskaia, Hans Adomat, Xiaoqi Chen, John Langlands, Dennis Brown, Jeffrey Bacha, Colin C. Collins, Artem Cherkasov, Mads Daugaard

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineComputational biologyCancer researchOncologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Brain tumors, including primary brain tumors and central nervous system (CNS) metastases, remain among the most challenging malignancies to treat, with therapeutic options often limited by the inability of drugs to penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is a key enzyme in DNA repair, and inhibition of PARP1 specifically drives synthetic lethality in BRCA-mutated disease. While they have achieved commercial success, first generation PARP inhibitors are limited in their utility as they cannot readily pass through the blood-brain barrier and produce adverse side effects, likely driven by the collateral inhibition of PARP2. Development of a PARP1-selective CNS penetrant inhibitor could reduce toxicity, while providing a new therapeutic option for brain tumors. Traditional drug discovery methods are time-consuming and costly, necessitating innovative approaches. Here, we describe the application of Deep Docking combined with generative artificial intelligence (AI), to discover a novel, PARP1-selective inhibitor for use against brain tumors. Methods: Deep Docking utilizes deep learning to accelerate the prediction of the binding affinity of a large number of compounds to target proteins, streamlining the virtual screening process and allowing for rapid docking of billions of compounds against the PARP1 protein. Additionally, state-of-the-art generative algorithms and deep learning techniques for predicting CNS penetrance can be combined with Deep Docking to rapidly perform hit-to-lead optimization of a CNS-penetrating PARP1-selective inhibitor. Results: We will present Deep Docking screening results from billions of compounds. Validating in vitro and in vivo data, including PARP1 inhibition and selectivity, BBB permeability, metabolic stability, pharmacokinetic profile, and CNS penetration will be described. Conclusion: The Deep Docking platform is being used in concert with generative AI approaches to discover and finetune a selective PARP-1 inhibitor for brain tumors. This approach will not only improve the efficiency of drug discovery but also enhance the specificity and efficacy of potential therapeutics. Citation Format: Sarah Truong, Beibei Zhai, Louise Ramos, Mona Marzban, Fariba Ghaidi, Fuqiang Ban, Jason Smith, Mohit Pandey, Ekaterina Manskaia, Kally Singh, Hans Adomat, Xiaoqi Chen, John Langlands, Dennis Brown, Jeffrey Bacha, Colin Collins, Artem Cherkasov, Mads Daugaard. Discovery of novel PARP1-selective inhibitors for treatment of brain tumors using artificial intelligence [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 4186.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.258
GPT teacher head0.513
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy→French-language works237,207→