Coordinated regulation of self-renewal and cell cycle during human lympho-myeloid lineage restriction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Recent studies indicate the human lympho-myeloid restriction process to be a different and more heterogeneous one than historically inferred. Here we describe the development of bulk and clonal culture systems that efficiently support early B-lymphoid differentiation and its use to elucidate the biological and molecular changes that accompany their initial restriction from subsets of CD34+ human cord blood cells with lympho-myeloid-limited potential. Analyses of these changes revealed that the acquisition of B-lymphoid- and neutrophil/monocyte (NM)-restricted properties are accompanied by a concomitantly accelerated and lineage-shared cell cycling activity and loss of self-renewal potential. Single-cell transcriptome analysis identified reduced expression of multiple self-renewal-associated genes and an accompanying heterogeneous activation of lineage-regulatory modules during the production of B, NM, and dendritic cell precursors. By applying a novel culture system that supports early human lymphoid differentiation, we uncovered a shared mechanism of proliferation control, along with persistent biological and transcriptional heterogeneity in cells undergoing B- and NM-lineage restriction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".