Abstract 2495: Does single-cell gene expression reflect RNA abundance?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Transcriptional dysregulation is a hallmark of cancer that is often studied using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) to capture the transcriptomic profile of individual cells. However, these measurements are not directly representative of gene expression levels due to biased transcript detection which can lead to dramatic misinterpretations of the underlying biology. To demonstrate this phenomenon, we profiled baseline and drug-tolerant persister cells from a patient-derived colorectal cancer xenograft model. Although persister cells are known to be globally hypotranscriptive and exhibit lower total RNA and housekeeping expression by cell number-normalized (CNN) quantitative PCR (qPCR), significantly more transcripts and genes were detected by single-nuclei RNA-seq as compared to baseline. Additionally, we identified this trend in two independent lung adenocarcinoma persister scRNA-seq experiments and noticed an association with higher sequencing read depth per transcript. In all three cases, transcript over-detection could not be ameliorated through filtering, read subsampling, batch correction, or normalizations specifically developed to address read depth bias. As such, we developed a novel computational approach to correct the effects of sequencing read depth bias on scRNA-seq data and recover the relative expression of cells across samples. To benchmark the validity of our approach, we identified five genes predicted to be significantly upregulated from raw and conventionally-normalized counts but downregulated from our depth-normalized counts. Using CNN qPCR, we found decreased abundance of all five targets in colorectal cancer persister cells, in agreement with the depth-normalized analysis approach and results. Beyond the context of persister models, we also examined single-cell ATAC+RNA-seq and spatial transcriptomic data from lymphoma and prostate cancer specimens and demonstrate how depth normalization can be helpful for addressing technical anomalies, such as transcript under-detection due to tissue edge effects. Altogether, sequencing read depth normalization allows us to move beyond the current approach of scaling all cells to the same expression level and achieve more biologically accurate inference from scRNA-seq data. Citation Format: Christie Jay Lau, 1 Liliane Cabral-Fernandes, 1 Yadong Wang, 2 Sumaiyah K. Rehman, 2 Geoffrey Liu, 2 Catherine A. O'Brien, 2 Gregory W. Schwartz2. Does single-cell gene expression reflect RNA abundance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 2495.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".