MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409640727 · doi:10.1039/d4cb00230j

Monitoring SARS-CoV-2 Nsp13 helicase binding activity using expanded genetic code techniques

2025· article· en· W4409640727 on OpenAlexafffund
Eryn Lundrigan, Christine Hum, Nadine Ahmed, John Paul Pezacki

Bibliographic record

VenueRSC Chemical Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHelicaseSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)BiologyGeneticsVirologyComputational biologyMedicineGeneInternal medicineRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

-azido-l-phenylalanine (AzF) into Nsp13 for fluorescent labelling of the enzyme with a conjugated Cy5 fluorophore. This Cy5-labelled Nsp13-AzF can then be used in Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) experiments to investigate the dynamics of enzyme translocation on its substrate during binding and unwinding. Five sites (F81, F90, Y205, Y246, and Y253) were identified for AzF incorporation in Nsp13 and assessed for fluorescent labelling efficiency. The incorporation of AzF was confirmed to not interfere with the unwinding activity of the helicase. Subsequently, FRET-based binding assays were conducted to monitor the binding of Cy5-labelled Nsp13-AzF constructs to a series of fluorescently-labelled nucleic acid substrates in a distance-dependent manner. Overall, this approach not only allows for the direct monitoring of Nsp13's binding activity on its substrate, it may also introduce a novel method to screen for compounds that can inhibit this essential enzymatic activity during viral replication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRSC Chemical BiologySame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207