Digital-Twin-Enabled Industrial IoT: Vision, Framework, and Future Directions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Building digital twins (DTs) in industrial Internetof- Things (IIoT) is challenging, especially considering complex and large-scale network architectures, real-time data requirements, and computational demands. Traditional modeling-based approaches, relying on either small datasets with physics-based models or large datasets processed through artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, face limitations in adaptability and accuracy. In this article, we propose a hybrid DT framework to address these challenges, which integrates both physics-based models and AI techniques. The physics-based models, grounded in communication, computing, and caching (3C) resources, ensure alignment with known system behaviors and predetermined assumptions, while the AI components dynamically adapt to real-time network environments, allowing the DT to learn from the evolving environments. The proposed DT framework incorporates layers that support real-time data acquisition, data processing, and decision-making through continuous feedback, enhancing system performance and enabling proactive maintenance, quality control, and optimization. A hybrid model-based case study demonstrates that the proposed framework can reduce packet queuing size and improve network performance under varying network load and outage conditions. Finally, open research issues for DT in IIoT are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".