MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409649199 · doi:10.32768/abc.2025122181-186

Beyond Inflammation: Decoding the Bacterial Landscape of Granulomatous Mastitis

2025· article· en· W4409649199 on OpenAlexaff
Himen Salimizand, Rashid Ramazanzadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Breast Cancer · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersKurdistan University Of Medical Sciences
KeywordsInflammationDecoding methodsImmunologyBiologyMedicineComputer scienceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) is a rare, chronic inflammatory breast disease with an unclear etiology. This study aimed to investigate the potential microbial involvement in IGM by detecting bacterial DNA in biopsy samples. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 22 patients with histopathologically confirmed IGM, selected through convenience sampling from Besat Hospital, Sanandaj, Iran, in 2019. DNA was extracted from biopsy samples, and the 16S rRNA gene was amplified using universal primers. The amplified products were sequenced, and bacterial species were identified using NCBI BLAST. Results: The mean age of the patients was 35.23 years. DNA analysis revealed Escherichia coli in 21 of 22 samples (95.5%) and Staphylococcus lugdunensis in 1 sample (4.5%). The most common inflammatory symptom was erythema, observed in 8 patients (36.4%), while deep collections were the most frequent tissue abnormality, found in 10 patients (45.5%). Conclusion: The detection of E. coli in most samples suggests a potential bacterial role in IGM pathogenesis. Further research, including control samples from normal breast tissue, is needed to validate these findings and evaluate the potential benefits of molecular testing in clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Breast CancerSame topicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy CowsFrench-language works237,207