MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409655171 · doi:10.7202/1114543ar

<i>InStead:</i> Demonstrating allyship through a REDress reconciliation project

2024· article· en· W4409655171 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Mukwa Musayett, Patricia L. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social work review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian Geopolitics and Ethnography
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRedressPolitical scienceSociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article tells the story of how the personal truth and reconciliation journeys of an Indigenous professor and non-Indigenous (settler ally) master’s student coiled together after a university-based art exhibition. The exhibit, REDress Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls and Two-Spirit People (MMIWG2S) , opened at Thompson Rivers University (TRU) Art Gallery in October 2021. Its purpose was to honour the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada’s (2015) call to action #41. At the opening ceremony of the exhibit, Mukwa Musayett / Dr. Shelly Johnson gave a talk regarding murdered and missing Indigenous women, girls, and two-spirit people. The exhibit included a REDress pine needle sculpture by Patricia L. Smith. The sculpture and talk led to a joint discussion between us about the experiences that brought us to participate in the MMIWG2S exhibit at the same postsecondary institution. First, we developed a plan to write about this experience of Indigenous and settler allyship between a professor and a student. Second, we identified a proposed collaboration on an allyship project entitled InStead to further education, awareness and reconciliation regarding MMIWG2S with and between other postsecondary faculty, students, and community members.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social work reviewSame topicAsian Geopolitics and EthnographyFrench-language works237,207