WasmGuard: Enhancing Web Security through Robust Raw-Binary Detection of WebAssembly Malware
Bibliographic record
Abstract
WebAssembly (Wasm), a binary instruction format designed for efficient cross-platform execution, has rapidly become a foundational web standard, widely adopted in browsers, client-side, and server-side applications. However, its growing popularity has led to an increase in Wasm-targeted malware, including cryptojackers and obfuscated malicious scripts, which pose significant threats to web security. In spite of progress in deep learning based detection methods for Wasm malware, such as MINOS, these approaches face substantial performance degradation in adversarial environments. In our experiments, MINOS's detection accuracy dropped to 49.90% under adversarial attacks, revealing critical vulnerabilities. To address this, we introduce WasmGuard, a robust malware detection framework tailored for Wasm. WasmGuard employs FGSM-based adversarial training with prior-based initialization for perturbation bytes in customized sections, coupled with a novel adversarial contrastive learning objective. Using our large-scale dataset, WasmMal-15K (publicly available at https://github.com/Yuxia-Sun/WasmMal GitHub), WasmGuard outperforms six competing methods, achieving up to 99.20% Robust Accuracy and 99.93% Standard Accuracy under PGD-50 adversarial attacks, while maintaining low training overhead. Additionally, we have released WebChecker, a WasmGuard-powered browser plugin, providing real-time protection against malicious Wasm files, at https://github.com/Yuxia-Sun/WasmGuard.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".