Looking Beyond Lithium for Breakthroughs in Magnesium-Ion Batteries as Sustainable Solutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The increasing demand for sustainable and cost-effective battery technologies in electric vehicles (EVs) has driven research into alternatives to lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries. This study investigates magnesium-ion (Mg-ion) batteries as a potential solution, focusing on their energy density, cycle stability, safety, and scalability. The research employs a comprehensive methodology, combining electrochemical testing and simulation models, to analyse magnesium-based anodes, sulphur-based cathodes, and advanced electrolytes such as HMDS2Mg. Key findings reveal that Mg-ion batteries achieve a practical energy density of 500–1000 mAh/g, comparable to high-performance Li-ion systems. With sulphur–graphene cathodes, Mg-ion batteries demonstrated 92% capacity retention after 500 cycles, a 10% improvement over standard configurations. Ionic conductivity reached 1.2 × 10−2 S/cm using HMDS2Mg electrolytes, significantly reducing passivation layer growth to 5 nm after 100 cycles, outperforming Grignard-based systems by 30%. However, the research identified a 15% reduction in charge–discharge efficiency compared to Li-ion batteries due to slower ion diffusion kinetics. This study highlights the safety advantage of magnesium-ion batteries, which eliminate dendrite formation and reduce thermal runaway risks by 40%. These findings position Mg-ion batteries as a promising, sustainable alternative for EVs, emphasising the need for further optimisation in scalability and efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".