MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409670387 · doi:10.1016/j.chstcc.2025.100161

Long-Term Morbidity Associated With Non-COVID-19 Pneumonia in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation

2025· article· en· W4409670387 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alexander T. Clark, Clark I Strunk, Matthew W. Semler, Jonathan D. Casey, Cathy A. Jenkins, Guanchao Wang, James C. Jackson, E. Wes Ely, Amy L. Kiehl, Patsy T. Bryant, Alana Lauck, Stephanie C. DeMasi, Robert E. Freundlich, Wesley H. Self, Rameela Chandrasekhar, Jin H. Han

Bibliographic record

VenueCHEST Critical Care · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on AgingNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PneumoniaMedicine2019-20 coronavirus outbreakTerm (time)Mechanical ventilationIntensive care medicineSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)AnesthesiaInternal medicineVirologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)PhysicsOutbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the impact of acute respiratory illnesses on long-term morbidity. However, the long-term morbidity associated with non-COVID-19 pneumonia is unclear, particularly in patients who are receiving mechanical ventilation. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the burden of 12-month long-term cognitive impairment (LTCI), functional impairment, psychological distress, and quality of life in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation for non-COVID-19 pneumonia? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This single-site prospective cohort study enrolled patients with non-COVID-19 pneumonia receiving mechanical ventilation in the emergency department and ICUs from June 18, 2018, through August 30, 2021. Global cognition at 12 months was measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment for the Blind, with higher scores representing better cognition. Secondary outcomes were basic and instrumental activities of daily living (ADLs), physical function, psychological distress (posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD], depression, and anxiety), and quality of life. RESULTS: Of 408 patients with non-COVID-19 pneumonia (63.4%), 96 patients survived and completed the 12-month follow-up. Among survivors of non-COVID-19 pneumonia, 57.3% met the criteria for LTCI, 13.5% showed executive dysfunction, 17.7% showed impairments in at least 1 basic ADL, 51.0% showed impairments in at least 1 instrumental ADL, 44.0% demonstrated physical disability, 17.8% met the criteria for PTSD, 37.8% met the criteria for depression, 46.7% met the criteria for anxiety, and 19.4% rated their quality of life as poor at 12 months. INTERPRETATION: A substantial proportion of patients with non-COVID-19 pneumonia receiving mechanical ventilation met criteria for LTCI. Additionally, many demonstrated difficulty performing ADLs, showed physical disability, and experienced psychological sequelae, leading to poor quality of life at 12 months. Interventions designed to reduce these adverse outcomes are needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCHEST Critical CareSame topicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersFrench-language works237,207