<i>Corollasphaeridium</i> : a cryptic record of Cambrian loricate protists
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cambrian palynomorphs include conventional acritarchs (organic-walled microfossils of unknown affinity, often interpretable as phytoplankton cysts) but also spine-shaped forms sometimes interpreted as animal body parts. Here, we examine new specimens of the problematic spine-shaped palynomorph Corollasphaeridium Martin (in Dean and Martin, 1982) and reassess its taxonomic composition and biological affinities. The type species C. wilcoxianum, known previously from Cambrian–Ordovician boundary intervals in western Canada and north China, is reported here from the Nolichucky Shale Formation of the USA and the Deadwood Formation of Canada and the USA, extending its biostratigraphic range back to the lower upper Cambrian (Furongian) or middle Cambrian (Miaolingian). The new specimens of C. wilcoxianum exhibit the diagnostic form of a trumpet-shaped conical body with 5–12 apical spines, a flaring and infolded aperture rim, and an ornamentation of branched ridges. In contrast, specimens from the lower Cambrian (Series 2, Stage 4) Forteau Formation of Canada are assigned to C. lissum sp. nov. In common with lower Cambrian species from Australia and Siberia, C. lissum lacks the ridged ornamentation of the type species, but shares a distinctive infolded aperture rim and is intermediate in shape, supporting reunification of all species under Corollasphaeridium. The morphology and size distribution of Corollasphaeridium are difficult to reconcile with a phytoplanktic cyst or animal identity, and instead support comparisons with the protective cases of protists such as amoebozoan tests and tintinnid ciliate loricae. Therefore, we interpret Corollasphaeridium as a loricate protist, albeit without clear synapomorphies with any extant group. The palaeoenvironmental and palaeogeographical distribution of Corollasphaeridium suggests localisation in nearshore habitats, possibly limited to warm-water environments (palaeo-tropics to subtropics). Our results further emphasise the hidden high-level taxonomic diversity among “acritarchs”.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".