MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409686406 · doi:10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100450

Examining interactions between chronic pain, positive mental health and coping on past-year suicidal ideation in a Canadian sample

2025· article· en· W4409686406 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Sarah Turner, Justin J. Lang, Natalie Doan, Mélanie Varin, Wendy Thompson, Raelyne L. Dopko

Bibliographic record

VenueSSM - Mental Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of OttawaUniversity of ManitobaPublic Health Agency of Canada
FundersPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsSuicidal ideationMental healthChronic painClinical psychologyCoping (psychology)PsychologyPsychiatryIdeationSuicidal behaviorSample (material)MedicineSuicide preventionPoison controlMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic pain affects approximately 20% of the Canadian population and is related to increases in suicide-related outcomes. Protective factors for suicidal behaviours are understudied, yet they are an important area of research for promoting mental health and preventing suicide. This study examined the relationship between chronic pain and past-year suicidal ideation and the moderating roles of positive mental health and coping. Data were from the 2019/20 cycle of the Canadian Community Health Survey, a cross-sectional Canadian survey (n= 64,654). Chronic pain (yes/no), positive mental health (including self-rated mental health (low/high) and community belonging (low/high)), coping (low/high) and past-year suicidal ideation (yes/no) were measured using self-report survey questions. We used weighted logistic regression to assess relationships between chronic pain, self-rated mental health, community belonging, coping, and suicidal ideation adjusting for sociodemographic, mental health and substance use variables. Additive and multiplicative interactions were used to test moderation between chronic pain, positive mental health and coping on past-year suicidal ideation. Experiencing chronic pain was associated with increased odds of suicidal ideation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.32, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.85- 2.90). High positive mental health and coping were protective factors for suicidal ideation (aORs of 0.13, 0.57 and 0.24, respectively). Additive interactions showed that experiencing chronic pain, along with low positive mental health or coping was associated with a higher odds of suicidal ideation than the sum of the individual associations. There were no significant multiplicative interactions. This study shows that chronic pain is associated with higher odds of suicidal ideation, and the odds were even higher for those who also reported low positive mental health or coping. In addition to facilitating reductions in chronic pain, providing individuals experiencing chronic pain with mental health support and coping skills may protect against suicidal ideation. Highlights • Chronic pain is a risk factor for suicidal ideation. • Positive mental health (PMH) and coping are protective for suicidal ideation. • Links between chronic pain and suicidal ideation are similar for males and females. • PMH moderates the relationship between chronic pain and suicidal ideation. • Coping moderates the relationship between chronic pain and suicidal ideation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSM - Mental HealthSame topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFrench-language works237,207