MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409686631 · doi:10.1016/j.jafr.2025.101944

Effect of 11 essential oils on seed germination, radicle development, and seedling growth in wheat and barley

2025· article· en· W4409686631 on OpenAlexaff
Luluh N. Aljayan, Tess Astatkie, Charles L. Cantrell, Valtcho D. Zheljazkov

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agriculture and Food Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAllelopathy and phytotoxic interactions
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersSaudi Arabian Cultural MissionOregon State University
KeywordsRadicleSeedlingGerminationAgronomyBiologyHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wheat and barley are the two most important small-grain crops globally. A persistent challenge in their cultivation is pre-harvest sprouting (PHS), which occurs when seeds begin to germinate on the spike due to rainfall before harvest. Despite ongoing efforts, effective and environmentally friendly solutions for PHS control are limited. This study presents a novel approach by exploring the use of essential oils (EOs) as natural germination suppressants. This study hypothesized that essential oils (EOs) could suppress seed germination in wheat and barley, offering a potential avenue for developing products to mitigate PHS. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effects of 11 EOs on the germination rate (%), number of seminal roots, root length (mm), and seedling height (mm) of two grain crops: wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.). The EOs tested included Eucalyptus polybractea (blue mallee), Eucalyptus globulus (southern blue gum), Cinnamomum cassia (Chinese cassia), Abies sabirinensis (fir needle), Artemisia vulgaris (mugwort), Citrus paradisi (grapefruit), Commiphora myrrha (myrrh), Melaleuca viridiflora (Niaouli), Pinus strobus (Eastern white pine), Citrus reticulata (tangerine), and Cymbopogon martini (palmarosa). Essential oils were applied at rates of (0, 10, 30, and 90 μL/Petri dish) to study their inhibitory effect on seeds. The application of Cymbopogon martini and Cinnamomum cassia EOs reduced wheat and barley seed germination rate (%), number of seminal roots, root length (mm), and seedling height (mm) at 10 μL. Therefore, they were further evaluated at reduced amounts (0, 1, 3, and 9 μL/Petri dish). Barley and wheat seed germination was suppressed by applying Cymbopogon martini and Cinnamomum cassia EOs at 1, 3 and 9 μL; these EO significantly decreased all response variables relative to the non-treated control. Due to the effectiveness of the EOs, even at low amounts, a tetrazolium test (TZ) was conducted to test the viability of the seeds after they were exposed to EOs. The results of the TZ test showed that EOs had significant effects on seed viability. When the amount of EOs increased, the viability of the seed decreased. More research is necessary to confirm the findings in field conditions. This study was the first report to demonstrate that Cymbopogon martini and Cinnamomum cassia EO have promising potential as natural agents for controlling preharvest sprouting (PHS) in wheat and barley, offering a sustainable alternative to synthetic chemicals in grain production and storage systems. • Pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) severely impacts wheat and barley crop yields globally. • We assessed essential oils from 11 plants for wheat and barley seed germination. • Cymbopogon martini and Cinnamomum cassia oils suppressed wheat and barley germination at 1–9 μL. • Seed viability decreased as essential oil application rates increased. • EOs show potential for mitigating PHS in small-grain crops.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agriculture and Food ResearchSame topicAllelopathy and phytotoxic interactionsFrench-language works237,207