MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409688809 · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2025.1549072

Relationship between cerebrospinal fluid circulation markers, brain degeneration, and cognitive impairment in cerebral amyloid angiopathy

2025· article· en· W4409688809 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Li Zhao, Lingyun Liu, Lin Miao, Linyun Xie, Hui Hong, Qingze Zeng, Shuyue Wang, Ruiting Zhang, Zhen‐Hua Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Aging Neuroscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCerebral amyloid angiopathyCerebrospinal fluidCognitive impairmentMedicinePathologyAmyloid (mycology)Cerebral circulationNeuroscienceDegeneration (medical)DementiaPsychologyCardiologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives To investigate whether cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation markers alter in patients with probable cerebral amyloid angiopathy (pCAA) and whether they are associated with brain degeneration and cognitive impairment. Methods We screened pCAA patients from the ADNI3 database according to the Boston 2.0 Criteria. Fifty-two patients with cognitive impairment (26 pCAA; 26 age-sex-matched non-pCAA) and 26 age-sex-matched cognitively normal control (NC) were included in this study. All participants underwent neurological MRI and cognitive assessments. Choroid plexus (ChP) was segmented using a deep learning-based method and its volume was extracted. Diffusion tensor imaging analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) was used to assess perivenous fluid mobility. AD pathological markers (Aβ and tau) were assessed using positron emission tomography. Brain parenchymal damage markers included white matter hyperintensities (WMH) volume and brain atrophy ratio. All markers were compared among the three groups. Correlations among the ChP volume, DTI-ALPS index, parenchymal damage markers, and cognitive scales were analyzed in the pCAA group. Results The three groups exhibited significant differences in cognitive scores, AD biomarkers, and imaging markers. Post hoc analyses showed that patients with pCAA had significantly higher WMH volume, higher Aβ and tau deposition, and lower DTI-ALPS compared to NC. However, no difference in ChPs volume was found among the groups. Controlling for age, sex, and vascular risk factors, partial correlation analyses showed a significant negative correlation between the DTI-ALPS and WMH volume fraction (r = −0.606, p = 0.002). ChP volume was significantly associated with the Montreal cognitive assessment score (r = −0.492, p = 0.028). Conclusion CSF circulation markers were associated with elevated WMH burden and cognitive impairments in probable CAA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Aging NeuroscienceSame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207