MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409689383 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-1225

Abstract 1225: Phenotypically-relevant patient-derived 3D cell models to interrogate personalized medicine approaches at scale

2025· article· en· W4409689383 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas J. Grundy, Peilin Tan, Joanna Wasielewska, Christine M. Yee, Tania M. Fowke, Sean Porazinski

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsKensington Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersonalized medicineScale (ratio)Computational biologyMedicineBiologyBioinformaticsGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The complexity and heterogeneity of cancers both intra- and inter-patient have led to the precision medicine paradigm of cancer therapy where treatment is personalized to the individual patient. Recent clinical trials such as the I-PREDICT study [1] have underscored the benefits of approaches matching combination therapies to the patient’s molecular alterations, leading to improved disease control and survival rates. Tumoroids are patient-derived cancer cells that grow as 3D self-organized, multicellular organoids that maintain key characteristics of the patient tumor of origin including molecular features such as genotype and gene expression, and biological behaviors. Whilst these models serve as valuable tools for studying tumor biology and responses of patient-derived cells to various anti-cancer therapies, the establishment and maintenance of tumoroids has historically been difficult and labor intensive, limiting more widespread use. Here, we utilize the Inventia RASTRUMTM platform and OncoProTM colorectal cancer (CRC) Tumoroid Cell Lines (ThermoFisher Scientific [2]) to easily create plug and play patient-derived 3D cell models based on synthetic PEG-based hydrogel matrices, which were tuned to mimic the tissue stiffness and ECM composition of CRC tumors. We used this workflow to evaluate how these 3D models maintain the clinicopathological features of patient-derived tumoroid cells, as well as molecular features and cellular signaling native to the tumor and its microenvironment. We further demonstrate the utility of this approach for throughput drug screening and predicting personalized therapy responses. Overall, our approach provides a scalable framework for evaluating precision medicine approaches using clinically-relevant patient-derived tumoroids. Future work will focus on the development of processes to support direct dissociation and generation of patient-derived models from biopsies from a variety of cancer types and larger scale utility of the RASTRUM platform in workflows that could be leveraged to inform treatment decision making. References [1] Sicklick JK et al. Molecular profiling of cancer patients enables personalized combination therapy: the I-PREDICT study. Nat Med. 2019 May;25(5):744-750.[2] Paul CD et al. Long-term maintenance of patient-specific characteristics in tumoroids from six cancer indications in a common base culture media system. bioRxiv 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.10.598331 Citation Format: Thomas Grundy, Peilin Tan, Joanna Wasielewska, Christine Yee, Tania Fowke, Sean Porazinski. Phenotypically-relevant patient-derived 3D cell models to interrogate personalized medicine approaches at scale [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 1225.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topic3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207