The association between dietary fat quality and quantity and hospitalization duration in COVID-19 in Iranian patients: a cross-sectional study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background The global impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19 (has highlighted the necessity of understanding factors influencing its severity and hospitalization duration. While a balanced diet is crucial for immune support, the role of dietary fats in this context has not been well understood. This study explored associations between the quality and quantity of fatty acids and severity and the length of hospitalization in COVID-19 patients in 2022. Method This cross-sectional study included 107 COVID-19 patients aged 20–60 years who were hospitalized at Amir Alam Hospital in Tehran, Iran. Dietary fat intake was assessed using 24 h food recall. Data on symptoms were collected using a demographic questionnaire and verified against their hospital records. Linear and binary logistic regressions were employed for statistical analysis. Result A higher omega 6/omega 3(N6/N3) ratio was linked to increased odds of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and elevated D-dimer levels, while correlating with lower odds of fever. While RDS odds increased over Vit E/polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) ratio tertiles, chills decreased. [PUFA + monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA)]/saturated fatty acid (SFA) ratio was associated with reduced odds of chest pain, duration of hospitalization (DH) time, c-reactive protein (CRP), and D-dimer levels. Furthermore, PUFA intake was negatively associated with odds of poor appetite, RDS, and headaches, whereas SFA intake was positively associated with odds of fever. Additionally, there was a positive correlation between cholesterol-saturated index (CSI) levels and DH time ( P < 0.7). Conclusion Our findings indicate that higher N6/N3 and VitE/PUFA ratios were associated with increased RDS and D-dimer levels, while the VitE/PUFA ratio was linked to reduced chills. Higher (PUFA + MUFA)/SFA ratios were associated with lower chest pain, DH, CRP, and D-dimer levels. While higher PUFA intake was related to reduced poor appetite, RDS, and headache, higher SFA intake was linked to increased fever. Additionally, there was a positive association between CSI levels and DH. Current findings indicate that the quality and balance of dietary fats may play a crucial role in modulating inflammatory responses and clinical outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".