Curcumin as a potential therapeutic agent for Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Importance: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a growing global health concern with the number of affected individuals projected to double by 2040. Current treatments primarily address motor symptoms but do not prevent disease progression and often have significant side effects. Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of curcumin as an adjunctive treatment for PD, with a focus on its impact on motor and non-motor symptoms, quality of life, and neuroprotective mechanisms, especially regarding α-synuclein aggregation. Evidence Review: A systematic search was conducted in Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library from February to March 2025, using specific search terms, and following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The search strategy used the terms ("Parkinson's disease" OR "Parkinson Disease" OR "Parkinsonism") AND ("Curcumin" OR "Turmeric" OR "Diferuloylmethane" OR "Curcuminoids"), limiting results to English-language publications. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 Tool was used for assessing the risk of bias in RCTs, and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for the cohort study. Findings: The review included two randomized controlled trials and one cohort study, comprising a total of 125 PD participants. The studies suggest that curcumin may offer modest benefits as an adjunct therapy in PD when administered in formulations designed to enhance its bioavailability. Long-term curcumin supplementation was associated with a slower deterioration of motor function and a tendency to reduce the deposition of phosphorylated α-synuclein in skin nerves. A nanomicelle formulation of curcumin significantly improved sleep quality and overall quality of life in PD patients over a three-month period, while no significant effect was observed on fatigue severity. Conclusion and Relevance: Curcumin, particularly in formulations that enhance its bioavailability, may be a beneficial add-on treatment for PD, potentially improving non-motor symptoms and slowing the advancement of motor dysfunction. However, current clinical practice guidelines do not recommend curcumin due to the limited and preliminary nature of the evidence. Additional validation through larger trials with standardized methodologies is necessary to confirm these findings. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251000404.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".