MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409694726 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-90065-5

Applications of Evolutionary Computation

2025· book· en· W4409694726 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLecture notes in computer science · 2025
Typebook
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEvolutionary Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Information and Communications TechnologyInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'EnvironnementSorbonne UniversitéRégion NormandieUniversität KonstanzUniversity of South AfricaUniversidad de GranadaSyddansk UniversitetTechnische Universität BerlinUniversidade de LisboaUniversidade de CoimbraUniversitat Oberta de CatalunyaUniversitetet i OsloHong Kong Baptist UniversityUniversità degli Studi di Milano-BicoccaUniversidad Complutense de MadridUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of TwenteUniversidad de ExtremaduraUniversità degli Studi di TorinoUniversità degli Studi di TrentoUniversità degli Studi di ParmaHeriot-Watt UniversityQueensland University of TechnologyIran Telecommunication Research CenterSwansea UniversityEdinburgh Napier UniversityTechnische Universität DarmstadtCardiff UniversityPomona CollegeUniversité de LilleUniversidad de MálagaCarl von Ossietzky Universität OldenburgUniversità Degli Studi di Modena e Reggio EmilaUniversiteit LeidenInstitut "Jožef Stefan"Yeditepe ÜniversitesiMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyUniversity of North Carolina WilmingtonEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemSilesian University of TechnologyUniversité du LuxembourgSveučilište u ZagrebuAberystwyth University
KeywordsComputer scienceEvolutionary computationComputationArtificial intelligenceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueLecture notes in computer scienceSame topicEvolutionary Algorithms and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207