MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409696700 · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000042218

Effects of heel kicking exercise on knee pain and joint function in knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial

2025· article· en· W4409696700 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhao-Li Tan, Jiawen Wang, Yingfeng Cai, Jianpeng Zhou, Tianzhao Tian, Peng Huang, Pei Zhou, Jiahui Li, Fang Zheng, Baoxin Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicExercise and Physiological Responses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOsteoarthritisHeelPhysical therapyRandomized controlled trialKnee JointPhysical medicine and rehabilitationKnee painSurgeryAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Exercise therapy is a core intervention for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). For KOA patients, active and passive stretching exercises can relieve joint pain and restore joint function. Heel kicking exercise (HKE) is a dynamic stretching method designed by the authors to rapidly reduce knee pain and restore joint function in patients with KOA. This randomized controlled trial was conducted to determine the efficacy of HKE for pain and joint function in patients with KOA. METHOD: A total of 68 patients with KOA were included in this study. Eight patients were excluded, resulting in random allocation into a control group (N = 29, 1 lost to follow-up) and an observation group (N = 30). Both groups received traditional Chinese medicine hot compress therapy, oral administration of celecoxib capsules, and quadriceps contraction exercises. The control group additionally performed static stretching exercises targeting the quadriceps, hamstrings, and gastrocnemius muscles; conversely, the observation group performed in HKE. Changes in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain and stiffness indices, knee joint range of motion, Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test, Timed Up and Go Test, and Six-Minute Walk Test were assessed before treatment initiation and after 2 weeks. RESULTS: Before treatment, there were no significant differences in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain and stiffness score, joint range of motion, Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test, Timed Up and Go Test, and Six-Minute Walk Test levels between the 2 groups (P > .05). After treatment, the observation group outperformed the control group across all indicators (P < .05, P < .01). Patients' satisfaction within 2 groups were investigated, which showed that patients' satisfaction within the observation group were better than those in the control group (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: HKE is an effective and safe exercise therapy that significantly alleviates knee pain in patients with KOA while restoring joint function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicineSame topicExercise and Physiological ResponsesFrench-language works237,207