MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409698458 · doi:10.3390/photonics12050406

55% Efficient High-Power Multijunction Photovoltaic Laser Power Converters for 1070 nm

2025· article· en· W4409698458 on OpenAlexaff
Simon Fafard, Denis Masson

Bibliographic record

VenuePhotonics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicsolar cell performance optimization
Canadian institutionsBroadcom (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvertersMaterials sciencePhotovoltaic systemPower (physics)OptoelectronicsLaserElectrical engineeringOpticsPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-efficiency multijunction laser power converters are demonstrated for the first time at high power for optical inputs around 1070 nm. The InP-based photovoltaic power-converting III–V heterostructures are designed with eight lattice-matched InGaAsP subcells (PT8-1070 nm). Conversion efficiencies of 55% were obtained at 18 W of output power. Endurance testing was performed for over 1000 h of continuous operation with an average output power of 13.2 W at an input wavelength of 1064 nm. An average steady-state efficiency of 54.4% at an ambient temperature of ~20 °C was obtained for that duration. The results demonstrate that 1 cm2 optical power converter devices can produce electrical outputs of 20 W at maximum power voltages around Vmpp ~6 V, thus retaining an optimal load near Rmpp at ~2 ohms. Efficiencies between 57.9% and 59.0% were also obtained for smaller 0.029 cm2 chips for input intensities between 35 and 69 W/cm2. This is an important development for power beaming applications: the unprecedented combination of power and conversion efficiency capabilities is expected to enable deployments for key wavelengths between 1040 and 1080 nm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhotonicsSame topicsolar cell performance optimizationFrench-language works237,207