MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409699326 · doi:10.22215/cujs.v3i2.5083

Identification of Mountain Pine Beetle Fungal Associates Using Whole Genome Sequence Data

2025· article· en· W4409699326 on OpenAlexaff
Roqeeb A. Akinbile, Caroline Grela, Catherine I. Cullingham

Bibliographic record

VenueCarleton undergraduate journal of science. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Insect Ecology and Management
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMountain pine beetleIdentification (biology)BiologyWhole genome sequencingGenomeSequence (biology)Bark beetleBotanyComputational biologyGeneticsEcologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mountain pine beetle (MPB), Dendroctonus ponderosae, is a forest pest in western North America, infesting millions of hectares of pine forests and causing extensive tree mortality. As the MPB infests trees, it introduces fungal symbionts to the tree. These blue-stain fungi facilitate the beetle's colonization and reproduction within the tree. The blue stain fungi comprise multiple species, and our understanding of the diversity and prevalence of these individual species remains limited. This study aims to identify and characterize the fungal associates of the MPB, gain insight into fungal distribution, and aid in forest management strategies. The study was conducted by collecting 26 MPB specimens from various locations across North America and extracting DNA for whole-genome sequencing using next-generation Sequencing Illumina sequencing. A bioinformatic pipeline was developed to analyze the sequencing data and characterize the fungal community associated with individual MPB sequences. Here, we show that it is possible to use whole genome sequencing to identify the fungal associates transmitted by MPB. Our results align with previous literature characterizing the presence of Grosmannia clavigera and Ophiostoma montium as primary fungal partners in MPB populations across various regions. The analysis aims to understand the geographic distribution trends of these fungal species in different habitats. Furthermore, this project provides valuable insights into the role of these various fungi species in supporting MPB during range expansion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCarleton undergraduate journal of science.Same topicForest Insect Ecology and ManagementFrench-language works237,207