MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409701850 · doi:10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf044.202

Clinical implications in early diagnosis of infective endocarditis

2025· article· en· W4409701850 on OpenAlexaff
M Nunez Ruiz, G Padilla Rodriguez, A Gomez Gonzalez, A Pena Rodriguez, Luis Eduardo López-Cortés, F J Escalona Garcia

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsCanarie
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInfective endocarditisEndocarditisInternal medicineCardiologyIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction The diagnostic delay of infective endocarditis (IE) is common due to its low clinical suspicion and often insidious course. An early diagnosis is essential for prompt treatment initiation and for preventing adverse outcomes. Purpose This study aims to analyze the time from the onset of symptoms to a confirmed diagnosis via echocardiography, considering the APORTEI score and microbiological identification, as well as implications for complications and mortality. Methods This was a retrospective observational study conducted on patients diagnosed with IE between 2016 and 2023. The comparison of the mean duration from symptom onset to diagnosis across different groups was performed using Student's t-test (for 2 groups) and ANOVA (for >2 groups). Post-hoc analyses were conducted when statistically significant differences were identified. Results Among a total of 188 patients (72.5% male; median age: 69 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 68), the median duration from the first symptom to diagnosis was 17 days (IQR: 4–92). Significant new-onset valvular dysfunction (including stenosis, insufficiency, or mixed lesions) was diagnosed in 65.6% of patients; however, no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups. Regarding the incidence of cerebral embolisms, systemic embolisms, and septic shock, there were no statistically significant differences. Differences in the time to diagnosis were observed between infections caused by different microorganisms (F[2,28] = 6, p = 0.04), particularly between S. bovis and S. aureus (p = 0.014), with earlier diagnosis noted in cases involving S. aureus. Significant differences were also found when stratifying by APORTEI risk score (low, moderate, high, and very high risk) (F[3,14] = 3, p = 0.027), with significance between low risk compared to high and very high risk (p = 0.03 and p = 0.027, respectively). Over a follow-up period of 28.4 months, 33.3% of patients died due to cardiovascular causes. These patients were diagnosed earlier, with a mean time to diagnosis of 15.2 days, whereas those who survived experienced a delay in the diagnosis, with a mean of 30.9 days (p = 0.02). Conclusions Patients with a poorer prognosis were those diagnosed earlier, probably due to a more aggressive disease course, which also coincided with more virulent microorganisms (E. coli, S. aureus) and higher risk stratifications according to the APORTEI score.Mean days and microorganismsMortality and mean days

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular CareSame topicInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and ManagementFrench-language works237,207