MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409716524 · doi:10.1016/j.watcyc.2025.04.006

Occurrence and ecological risk of microplastics in different mariculture feeds

2025· article· en· W4409716524 on OpenAlexaff
Anqi Ge, Liuqingqing Liu, Jialu Xu, Cuizhu Sun, Zixi Yuan, Rongyuan Wang, Hao Zheng, Xianxiang Luo, Lingyun Chen, Fengmin Li

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Cycle · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaricultureMicroplasticsFisheryEnvironmental scienceBusinessEcologyBiologyAquacultureFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pollution of microplastics (MPs) in mariculture animals and its risk to human health remain a growing concern. However, although much attention has been paid to the release of MPs in mariculture facilities, few reports can be found on the occurrence of MPs in mariculture feeds consumed by mariculture animals. Therefore, the present study investigated the occurrence patterns of MPs in 23 types of mariculture feeds for different species at different life history stages, and the related ecological risks of these MPs were also assessed. MPs were prevalent with an average abundance of 5491 ± 2712 particles kg −1 in all the mariculture feeds. Notably, the abundance of MPs in Stichopus japonicus (SJ) feeds was the highest, especially in adult stage feeds of SJ (19683 ± 6789 particles kg −1 ). The majority of MPs in mariculture feeds were 20–500 μm in size (81.4%), shaped as fragments (66.2%) and fibers (23.5%), mostly transparent (58.5%) and yellow (18.3%) in color, and the polymer types were dominated by polycaprolactone (PCL), polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE), and cellophane (CP), which together accounted for 61.6%. More importantly, the risk index (H) indicated that MPs in Sebastes schlegelii feeds had high risk ( H : 100–1000), while Litopenaeus vannamei , Penaeus monodon , Stichopus japonicus , and Larimichthys crocea feeds had medium risk ( H : 10–100). These findings offer valuable information about MP contamination in mariculture feeds and establish a theoretical foundation for the safe production and use of mariculture feeds, contributing to the development of a risk assessment framework for MPs in mariculture feeds. •Heavy microplastic (MP) pollution occurred in all the mariculture feeds. •Sea cucumber Stichopus japonicus feeds had the highest abundance of MPs. •Transparent and yellow fragments and fibers with sizes of 20–500 μm were dominant. •Polycaprolactone, polypropylene, polyethylene, and cellophane dominated in feeds. •The ecological risk of MPs in Sebastes schlegelii feeds was the highest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater CycleSame topicMicroplastics and Plastic PollutionFrench-language works237,207