The mechanism of peptidoglycan O-acetylation in Gram-negative bacteria typifies bacterial MBOAT-SGNH acyltransferases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bacterial cell envelope polymers are commonly modified with acyl groups that provide fitness advantages. Many polymer acylation pathways involve pairs of membrane-bound O-acyltransferase (MBOAT) and SGNH family proteins. As an example, the MBOAT protein PatA and the SGNH protein PatB are required in Gram-negative bacteria for peptidoglycan O-acetylation. The mechanism for how MBOAT-SGNH transferases move acyl groups from acyl-CoA donors made in the cytoplasm to extracellular polymers is unclear. Using the peptidoglycan O-acetyltransferase proteins PatAB, we explore the mechanism of MBOAT-SGNH pairs. We find that the MBOAT protein PatA catalyzes auto-acetylation of an invariant Tyr residue in its conserved C-terminal hexapeptide motif. We also show that PatB can use a synthetic hexapeptide containing an acetylated tyrosine to donate an acetyl group to a peptidoglycan mimetic. Finally, we report the structure of PatB, finding that it has structural features that shape its activity as an O-acetyltransferase and distinguish it from other SGNH esterases and hydrolases. Taken together, our results support a model for peptidoglycan acylation in which a tyrosine-containing peptide at the MBOAT's C-terminus shuttles an acyl group from the MBOAT active site to the SGNH active site, where it is transferred to peptidoglycan. This model likely applies to other systems containing MBOAT-SGNH pairs, such as those that O-acetylate alginate, cellulose, and secondary cell wall polysaccharides.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".