MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409721432 · doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2025.02.003

Prognostic Time Frame of Plaque and Hemodynamic Characteristics and Integrative Risk Prediction for Acute Coronary Syndrome

2025· article· en· W4409721432 on OpenAlexaff
Seokhun Yang, Jae Wook Jung, Sang‐Hyeon Park, Jinlong Zhang, Keehwan Lee, Doyeon Hwang, Kyu‐Sun Lee, Sang-Hoon Na, Joon‐Hyung Doh, Chang‐Wook Nam, Tae Hyun Kim, Eun‐Seok Shin, Eun Ju Chun, Su‐Yeon Choi, Hyun Kuk Kim, Young Joon Hong, Hun‐Jun Park, Song‐Yi Kim, Mirza Husic, Jess Lambrechtsen, Jesper Møller Jensen, Bjarne Linde Nørgaard, Daniele Andreini, Pál Maurovich‐Horvat, Béla Merkely, Martin Pěnička, Bernard De Bruyne, Abdul Rahman Ihdayhid, Brian Ko, Γεώργιος Τζίμας, Jonathon Leipsic, Javier Sanz, Mark Rabbat, Farhan Katchi, Moneal Shah, Nobuhiro Tanaka, Ryo Nakazato, Taku Asano, Mitsuyasu Terashima, Hiroaki Takashima, Tetsuya Amano, Yoshihiro Sobue, Hitoshi Matsuo, Hiromasa Otake, Takashi Kubo, Masahiro Takahata, Takashi Akasaka, Teruhito Kido, Teruhito Mochizuki, Hiroyoshi Yokoi, Taichi Okonogi, Tomohiro Kawasaki, Kōichi Nakao, Tomohiro Sakamoto, Taishi Yonetsu, Tsunekazu Kakuta, Yohei Yamauchi, Charles A. Taylor, Jeroen J. Bax, Leslee J. Shaw, Peter H. Stone, Jagat Narula, Bon‐Kwon Koo

Bibliographic record

VenueJACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersHeartFlow
KeywordsMedicineCulpritAcute coronary syndromeCardiologyInternal medicineStenosisFractional flow reserveRadiologyVulnerable plaqueAngiographyLesionCoronary artery diseaseCoronary angiographyMyocardial infarctionSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.693

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJACC. Cardiovascular imagingSame topicCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207