Tissue scarring provides a biomechanical framework to promote mammalian bile duct regeneration through the activation of integrin-SRC/FAK signalling.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Following chronic injury, the adult mammalian bile duct regenerates by forming new branches, essentially replumbing the ductular system to overcome blockages and breaks. To regenerate effectively, biliary epithelial cells (BECs) receive a range of pro-mitogenic signals from myofibroblasts, which concurrently deposit a collagen-rich scar around the duct as it regrows. Despite epithelial regeneration and scarring occurring side-by-side, whether the deposition of scar tissue regulates ductular regeneration per se remains unclear. By inducing ductular fibrosis and regeneration in vivo, we show that the formation of collagen-I-rich scars around regenerating ducts changes the local biomechanical properties of these tissues, promoting the growth of ducts. Critically, this changing structural landscape is perceived by a spatially restricted population of biliary epithelial cells which forms a leading-tip of integrin-alpha2-high cells. This leading-tip undergoes partial-EMT-type reprogramming, allowing it to become migratory and coordinate ductular regeneration. We show that this process is directly driven through an integrin-alpha2-SRC/FAK signalling axis; thereby connecting epithelial regeneration directly to the changing fibrotic environment in chronic ductular disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".