MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409727964 · doi:10.1101/2025.04.11.648486

Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Wolf [ <i>Mahihkan</i> (Cree), <i>Tha</i> (Denesuline), <i>Amaruk</i> (Inuktitut), <i>Canis lupus</i> ] Occurrences on the Summer Range of the Eastern Migratory Cape Churchill Caribou Population in the Hudson Bay Lowlands of Manitoba

2025· preprint· en· W4409727964 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ryan K. Brook, Katrina Harris, Douglas A. Clark, Chloë Lochansky, Julie Colpitts

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersChurchill Northern Studies CentreParks CanadaGenome Canada
KeywordsCanisRange (aeronautics)GeographyCapeSystemic lupus erythematosusGeologyArchaeologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Wolves ( Canis lupus ) function as a top predator across diverse ecosystems including the sub-arctic, and they have been managed in often controversial ways. Communities and scientists are increasingly supporting minimally invasive research and monitoring, including using trail cameras. We employed a network of 15 Reconyx trail cameras at three monitoring areas aimed at detecting the spatial and temporal aspects of wolf occurrences within the summer range of Eastern Migratory Cape Churchill caribou in Wapusk National Park in the Hudson Bay Lowlands of Manitoba, Canada from 2013-2021. In this first peer-reviewed quantitative study of wolves in the region, we found that wolves detection events were generally consistent across years. Wolf distribution was consistently positively skewed toward the southern part of the caribou summer range in all years. Wolves experienced extreme environmental conditions, with a 60°C range in temperature, from a low of −32°C in winter to a high of +28°C in summer and an annual change in day length of >11 hours between summer and winter. Wolves occurred most commonly in spring and summer and occurred at equal frequency during night and day overall but selected for nighttime in September, October, and November as day length shortened dramatically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score0.904

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicWildlife Ecology and Conservation→French-language works237,207→