Rilzabrutinib in Antihistamine-Refractory Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Importance: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a skin disease driven mainly by the activation of cutaneous mast cells through various mechanisms. Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK), expressed in B cells and mast cells, plays a critical role in multiple immune-mediated disease processes. Objective: To determine the efficacy and risk profile of rilzabrutinib (SAR444671), an oral, reversible, covalent, next-generation BTK inhibitor, in treating patients with CSU. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Rilzabrutinib Efficacy and Safety in CSU (RILECSU) randomized clinical trial was a 52-week phase 2 study comprising a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging period, followed by a 40-week open-label extension. The trial was conducted from November 24, 2021, through April 23, 2024. Fifty-one centers enrolled and randomized participants across 12 countries in Asia, Europe, North America, and South America. The trial participants included adults aged 18 to 80 years with moderate to severe CSU (weekly Urticaria Activity Score [UAS7] of 16 or more; weekly Itch Severity Score [ISS7] of 8 or more) not adequately controlled with H1-antihistamine treatment. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to rilzabrutinib, 400 mg, once every evening (400 mg/d), twice per day (800 mg/d), 3 times per day (1200 mg/d), or matching placebo. Main Outcomes: The primary end point was change from baseline at week 12 in ISS7 (for US and US reference countries) or UAS7 (for non-US reference countries). Results: A total of 160 omalizumab-naive and omalizumab-incomplete responders were randomized (mean [SD] age, 44.1 [13.4] years; 112 [70.0%] female). The primary analysis population included only the 143 omalizumab-naive patients. Significant reductions at week 12 were observed with rilzabrutinib, 1200 mg/d, vs placebo from baseline in ISS7 (least squares [LS] mean, -9.21 vs -5.77; difference, -3.44 [95% CI, -6.25 to -0.62]; P = .02) and UAS7 (LS mean, -16.89 vs -10.14; difference, -6.75 [95% CI, -12.23 to -1.26]; P = .02). In addition, improvements in weekly Hives Severity Score (HSS7) and weekly Angioedema Activity Score (AAS7) were observed. Improvements in ISS7, UAS7, HSS7, and AAS7 were observed as early as week 1. CSU-related biomarkers, including soluble Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor X2, immunoglobulin (Ig)-G antithyroid peroxidase, IgG anti-Fc-ε receptor 1, and interleukin-31, were reduced compared to placebo at week 12. Rilzabrutinib demonstrated a favorable risk-benefit profile; adverse events occurring at a higher frequency with rilzabrutinib vs placebo included diarrhea, nausea, and headache. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of the RILECSU randomized clinical trial demonstrated efficacy and rapid onset of action of rilzabrutinib, 1200 mg/d, over 12 weeks, in addition to an acceptable adverse event profile. Together, these data support the use of rilzabrutinib in treating patients with moderate to severe CSU refractory to H1-antihistamines. Further research is needed to determine long-term efficacy and potential harms. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05107115.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it