MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409730590 · doi:10.25071/2561-5467.1312

Not Lost at Sea: The Ajax Club of Halifax

2025· article· fr· W4409730590 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Northern Mariner / Le marin du nord · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSport and Mega-Event Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill UniversityU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsAjaxClubWorld Wide WebHistoryComputer scienceGeologyWeb applicationPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Halifax was known as the least favourite wartime Atlantic port for sailors and roundly received criticism for the treatment of sailors ashore. The fate of the Ajax Club became a much-cited example of that belief. In May 1945 that displeasure would infamously come to a head in the V-E Day riots. The Ajax Club story and the naval badges received from ships’ crews and naval authorities are a reminder of the uncertainty of public memory. The efforts and legacy of a civilian woman was a local story that played an unexpectedly larger role in wartime Canada and in subsequent years. En temps de guerre, Halifax était connue comme le port atlantique le moins apprécié des marins en raison du manque d’installations de repos et de détente et d’une certaine frilosité de la part de la société locale. On a souvent cité comme exemple du caractère peu accueillant de la ville le sort du Ajax Club que Dolly McEuen a fondé pour accueillir les marins en 1940 et qui a fermé ses portes en 1942 suite aux pressions exercées par les partisans de la sobriété. Et le sort des insignes navals que le club recevait des équipages et des autorités navales reconnaissants pour décorer ses murs est un exemple de l’incertitude associée à la mémoire collective. Les campagnes menées par Dolly McEuen pour le bien-être des marins ont acquis une importance nationale pendant la guerre mais, malgré ses efforts de préserver et exposer les insignes navals en guise de mémorial, la collection a finalement été négligée et certains éléments ont été perdus. Le présent article fait partie d’un effort visant à récupérer et à préserver les insignes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.479
Threshold uncertainty score0.953

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0360.009
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Northern Mariner / Le marin du nordSame topicSport and Mega-Event ImpactsFrench-language works237,207