Neurological Recovery in 14 Cats With Epidural Lymphoma Treated With Chemotherapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rate and timing of neurological recovery in cats with epidural lymphoma who were treated with chemotherapy. The study included cats with various degrees of neurological impairment, confirmed diagnosis of lymphoma and spinal cord involvement. At the start of treatment, of the 14 cats diagnosed with lymphoma, 14.3% (n = 2) had ambulatory paraparesis, 14.3% (n = 2) had non-ambulatory paraparesis, 7.1% (n = 1) paraplegia with deep nociception, 50% (n = 7) were paraplegic with absent deep nociception and 14.3% (n = 2) had non-ambulatory tetraparesis. The chemotherapy treatment given was COP in 10 cats, COP and CHOP in 2 cats and CHOP in 2 cats. The number of chemotherapy sessions needed for neurological recovery varied from 1 to 4, with a total of 1-13 sessions per cat. The rate of neurological recovery was satisfactory in 83.3% (10/12) of the cats. This study indicates that cats with epidural lymphoma treated with chemotherapy have an 83.3% likelihood of partial neurological recovery and a 50% chance of full neurological recovery within a period of 7-28 days, regardless of the level of neurological impairment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".