MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409733039 · doi:10.1186/s13023-025-03711-6

Using chanarin-dorfman syndrome patient fibroblasts to explore disease mechanisms and new treatment avenues

2025· article· en· W4409733039 on OpenAlexafffund
Mor Angel, Yuval Kleinberg, Tanmoy Newaz, Victoria Li, Rinat Zaid, Keren Oved, Orly Dorot, Edward Pichinuk, Emily Avitan‐Hersh, Ann Saada, Karin Weiss, Vanina Zaremberg, Galit Tal, Einat Zalckvar

Bibliographic record

VenueOrphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLipid metabolism and biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDiseaseNonsense mutationOrganelleLipid dropletPeroxisomeMedicineMutationBiologyGeneInternal medicineGeneticsMissense mutation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Chanarin-Dorfman syndrome (CDS) is a multisystemic autosomal recessive rare disorder. CDS is caused by variants in the abhydrolase domain containing 5 (ABHD5) encoding gene (CGI-58), which ultimately leads to excessive lipid storage, and therefore a high abundance of cellular lipid droplets (LDs). Although the molecular etiology of the disease was described many years ago, no treatment for CDS is currently available. RESULTS: To further characterize the molecular basis of the disease and to uncover new treatment avenues, we used skin fibroblasts originating from a young patient diagnosed with CDS due to a homozygous nonsense mutation. We show that dysfunctional ABHD5 does not only affect LDs, but also influences other metabolic-related organelles; the mitochondria and peroxisomes. Additionally, we found that expressing functional ABHD5 in CDS patient cells reduced LD number. Finally, we developed and applied a high content-based drug repurposing screen based on a collection of ∼2500 FDA approved compounds, yielding several compounds that affected LD total area and size. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings enhance the understanding of the dysfunction underlying CDS and propose new avenues for the treatment of CDS patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrphanet Journal of Rare DiseasesSame topicLipid metabolism and biosynthesisFrench-language works237,207